Back to topics

 

First lines

"Your first line doesn't have to be a blockbuster, but it does have to have traction." 

Catherine Ryan Hyde, a multi-pubbed, best-selling author whose books have gone on to become movies told me this in a class on writing.

What she went on to explain was that while having a killer first line is always a good thing, what you really want is an intriguing first line that pulls the reader in and makes them want to read the second line. The second line temps you further to the next. And so on, and so on...until you're so deep into the book you're invested.

Yes, you can do that with the best of the best first line, but there are downfalls to trying to get ultimate shock value in your first ten or twenty words.

I've read books with awesome first lines. But the second line paled. And the third was downright ordinary. And it was all downhill from there. I've read books where the "perfect" first line lead to a second line that began a story seemingly unconnected, and found myself befuddled and frustrated (a great way to get your readers to wall-slam your novel).

But with traction, everything connects. With traction, you engage the reader enough to pull them in, then deeper, and deeper. With traction, you're not agonizing over that "irreplaceable" first line. I could spend YEARS looking for the stellar first line and never get any writing done. Which leads me to my next point about beginnings...

Somewhere along the way (can't remember where) I learned that a good beginning can only be written after the ending is complete. Only then do you have all the plot lines smoothed, all the characters developed. Only then can you write a beginning that intrigues and foreshadows, a beginning with originality and punch.

So, if your agonizing over that first line, that first paragraph or even that first chapter, would be to get the bones down and move on, check back at the end of chapter three, chapter ten. And when you think you're finished...go back and rewrite your beginning.